Retro Review

Some games age like fine wine. Others age like milk someone forgot in the back of the fridge. And then there’s El Grande - a game that somehow ages like stone. It was a monument when it arrived in 1995, and thirty years later, it’s still standing. Wolfgang Kramer and Richard Ulrich’s masterwork didn’t just win the Spiel des Jahres in 1996. It didn’t just sit in the BGG Top 10 for over a decade. In 2025, it was inducted into the BoardGameGeek Hall of Fame - a recognition that this isn’t just a good game, it’s a historically important one. ...

There’s a moment in every game of Tigris & Euphrates where you realise the civilisation you spent six turns carefully building doesn’t belong to you. It never did. Someone drops a red leader into your kingdom, triggers a revolt, and suddenly the temple network you’d been nursing is generating points for them. You sit there, tiles in hand, recalculating everything. That feeling - the vertigo of sudden loss, the scramble to adapt - is why this game was inducted into the BoardGameGeek Hall of Fame in 2025. Twenty-nine years after its release, Reiner Knizia’s masterpiece still does things no other game has managed to replicate. ...

There’s a moment in every game of El Grande where someone dumps four caballeros out of the Castillo into a region you thought was locked down, flips the entire scoring round on its head, and grins at you like they’ve been planning it for three rounds. They haven’t. They just seized the opportunity. And that’s the whole game. Wolfgang Kramer and Richard Ulrich’s 1995 masterpiece sits at a 7.77 rating on BGG with nearly 33,000 ratings, ranked #100 overall and #78 among strategy games, carrying a weight of 2.93/5. It plays 2-5 players in 60-120 minutes. It won the Spiel des Jahres in 1996. It was inducted into the BGG Hall of Fame in 2025. It invented area majority as a genre. ...

There’s a moment in every game of Tigris & Euphrates where someone connects two kingdoms, triggers a cascade of external conflicts, and the entire board state transforms so violently that everyone needs a moment of silence to process what just happened. Large swaths of tiles vanish. Leaders get expelled from civilisations they spent twenty minutes building. Someone who was cruising discovers their score is effectively two. Two. And it’s magnificent. Reiner Knizia’s 1997 masterpiece sits at a 7.70 rating on BGG from tens of thousands of ratings, ranked #131 overall, with a weight of 3.48/5. It plays 2-4 players in 60-120 minutes. Those numbers tell you it’s respected. They don’t tell you it’s one of the most elegant, brutal, and intellectually honest designs in the history of the hobby. ...

Galaxy Trucker Retro Review: Building a Spaceship That Falls Apart. Still Funny? The Legend In 2007, Galaxy Trucker landed like a small disaster. Which is fitting, because the whole game is about building a ship that absolutely should not be allowed in space, then watching the universe punish your optimism. Designed by Vlaada Chvátil and published by Czech Games Edition, it arrived in a hobby that was far less comfortable with real-time play than it is now. Plenty of eurogames asked you to think carefully. Galaxy Trucker asked you to panic, slap tiles onto a board, realise you’ve attached a cannon to nothing, and then launch anyway because the sand timer does not care about your dreams. ...

The Legend There are licensed games, and then there are games that make people shut up, lean over the board, and start speaking in full Tolkien narrator voice by hour two. War of the Ring is one of the rare ones. The kind where a licensed property stopped being a ceiling and became a launchpad. When Nexus Editrice released the first edition in 2004, nobody expected it to become a stone-cold all-time classic. Most licensed games of that era were competent at best - pretty boxes, middling gameplay, shelf filler. This one was different. ...

The Legend In 2008, Pandemic landed at exactly the right moment for the hobby. Not because the world was ready for disease cubes. Because the hobby was ready for a cooperative game that didn’t need a hidden traitor, a gimmick reveal, or a giant rules lecture to create tension. Matt Leacock’s design changed the conversation. This was the game that showed a lot of players, including plenty of non-hobby folks, that “we all lose together” could be just as dramatic as direct conflict. Maybe more. You had a world map, a handful of specialist roles, four actions, a deck that kept getting nastier, and those awful little outbreaks that could turn a stable board into a full-blown disaster in one bad sequence. Clean design. Immediate stakes. Real panic. ...